The surge in support for Australia’s populist right-wing party One Nation shows that another New World country is converging with the western restrictionist trend.
High levels of immigration create a strain on infrastructure and services to the detriment of the indigenous whites. But, it also obviates assimilation as the rapid increase allows the formatiom of parallel societies. It is Islam in particular that is the problem as it is anti-assimilation. People see that now and elites have no solution.
All of there hinder assimilation and would obviously increase the issue as priory.
And it seems like the elites not only have no solution - the pace with which they smack down people offering solutions, it seems like they do not want any.
I agree that it may not be easy to find solutions that fit the values of our free western world - but often it is not even allowed to discuss solutions, or they are outright framing the problems as a 'good' thing.
And the contrast to the pace and carelessness with which they want to/do push through 'solutions' to other problems (climate, environment, Corona, internet misinformation) is just wild.
There is no assimilation. If you look at the data, the differences persist.
Third-world immigration means decline, and eventually the end of civilization as we know it. Whites are starting to see it and will work to prevent and reverse it. It's only a question of time.
During Australia's more successful period of immigration it had two rules. One, insist on integration/assimilation. In local areas where immigration failed it was invariably asylum seekers wanting all the benefits of the West without becoming Western.
Two, for decades the Australians ringfenced blue collar labour- meaning little to no low-skilled or no skilled migration. This simultaneously meant that intergroup friction was lower, whilst also meaning that those migrants which did settle were the best of the bunch, far more likely to possess market dominant skills or drive and ambition.
> managed to win votes back from populists. However, once in office, these fiscally conservative but socially liberal parties did not prioritise restricting immigration
You mean they LIED. It is not that these parties /tried/ to reduce migration but got sidetracked - they either boosted a different group of migrants (UK, Netherlands) and/or frustrated attempts by others that tried (UK, Netherlands)
It is not unusual for politicians to lie - and it is not unusual that they get punished for it in the next elections.
Except for positions on migration, because the 'proper' media keeps covering it up by
-not reporting on the lack of action
-covering up failures
- publishing misleading statistics
Some of the anger regarding the migration debate scares me, but given the way politicians keep betraying voters it is perhaps not surprising that the debate radicalises.
But on the flip side, it also suggests that many people on the Right are perfectly fine voting for regular parties that support mild migration levels and want due process for removal of bad eggs - it is only desperation that has them now moving to parties with more extreme solutions.
High levels of immigration create a strain on infrastructure and services to the detriment of the indigenous whites. But, it also obviates assimilation as the rapid increase allows the formatiom of parallel societies. It is Islam in particular that is the problem as it is anti-assimilation. People see that now and elites have no solution.
Yes, there seem to be 3 issues;
- the absolute volume
- cultural differences
- the objection to removal of bad apples.
All of there hinder assimilation and would obviously increase the issue as priory.
And it seems like the elites not only have no solution - the pace with which they smack down people offering solutions, it seems like they do not want any.
I agree that it may not be easy to find solutions that fit the values of our free western world - but often it is not even allowed to discuss solutions, or they are outright framing the problems as a 'good' thing.
And the contrast to the pace and carelessness with which they want to/do push through 'solutions' to other problems (climate, environment, Corona, internet misinformation) is just wild.
There is no assimilation. If you look at the data, the differences persist.
Third-world immigration means decline, and eventually the end of civilization as we know it. Whites are starting to see it and will work to prevent and reverse it. It's only a question of time.
Absolutely brilliant article as always, Eric.
During Australia's more successful period of immigration it had two rules. One, insist on integration/assimilation. In local areas where immigration failed it was invariably asylum seekers wanting all the benefits of the West without becoming Western.
Two, for decades the Australians ringfenced blue collar labour- meaning little to no low-skilled or no skilled migration. This simultaneously meant that intergroup friction was lower, whilst also meaning that those migrants which did settle were the best of the bunch, far more likely to possess market dominant skills or drive and ambition.
> managed to win votes back from populists. However, once in office, these fiscally conservative but socially liberal parties did not prioritise restricting immigration
You mean they LIED. It is not that these parties /tried/ to reduce migration but got sidetracked - they either boosted a different group of migrants (UK, Netherlands) and/or frustrated attempts by others that tried (UK, Netherlands)
It is not unusual for politicians to lie - and it is not unusual that they get punished for it in the next elections.
Except for positions on migration, because the 'proper' media keeps covering it up by
-not reporting on the lack of action
-covering up failures
- publishing misleading statistics
Some of the anger regarding the migration debate scares me, but given the way politicians keep betraying voters it is perhaps not surprising that the debate radicalises.
But on the flip side, it also suggests that many people on the Right are perfectly fine voting for regular parties that support mild migration levels and want due process for removal of bad eggs - it is only desperation that has them now moving to parties with more extreme solutions.
Using" migrants "and "migration" means that you've accepted the concept of no borders policy for non whites to enter white heritage countries.